Making good decisions requires candidate options to be evaluated by accessing memories of relevant experiences. This deliberation is essential for goal-directed behavior, and not engaging in it underlies habits. In a new publication in Nature Neuroscience, the Daw Lab considers a more granular question: which specific memories are considered or ignored during deliberation and what is their ultimate effect on future decisions?
To address this question, the authors start with the idea that accessing memories helps us make better choices and harvest more rewards. This allowed them to quantify the utility of each memory in terms of how much extra reward would be earned following its access, suggesting a simple account of which memories are best. Through simulations, they investigated the patterns of memory access that would be obtained if an animal could access spatial memories sequentially, ordered by utility. These simulations showed that the patterns of reactivation predicted by the theory resemble, in many ways, the replay sequences measured in the rat hippocampus with electrophysiological recordings, including sequences that extend in forward and backward directions, and even patterns of memory reactivation during sleep. This simple theory provides a unifying explanation for numerous findings about place cells, and suggests a mechanism whose dysfunction could underlie pathologies like rumination and craving.
- From Nature Neuroscience: Prioritized memory access explains planning and hippocampal replay
- News and Views: Spoiled for choice, pressed for time
- News and Views: Are we of two minds?